Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 23 Aug 1996 09:08:34 -0600 (MDT)
From:      Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
To:        "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Cc:        joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch), freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Curio 
Message-ID:  <199608231508.JAA06728@rocky.mt.sri.com>
In-Reply-To: <6321.840786885@time.cdrom.com>
References:  <199608230659.IAA29250@uriah.heep.sax.de> <6321.840786885@time.cdrom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> 
> Speaking of which, I've been looking at how the tree is built during a
> make world and I notice that we do a make depend pass, then we do the
> make all, but by doing it in two passes this way it would seem that we
> lose what would be a free buffer-cache-load from the "make depend" for
> the "make all" since make depend reads through all the same files.
> Doncha think?

Except that if we do it at the same time 'make' isn't smart enough to
pick up the dependencies from the .depend file.  However, I'm not *real*
sure why we even do the depend stage since we build everything anyway.
One of the early tenents of the build process is that 'depend' shouldn't
be necessary to build a utility correctly.

One could probably remove the depend stage if you want.


Nate



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608231508.JAA06728>