Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 18:05:58 -0400
From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org>
To: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru>
Cc: sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org
Subject: Re: RFC: patch for bsd.port.mk to use ${PORTSDIR}/MOVED
Message-ID: <20030817220558.GO18091@toxic.magnesium.net>
In-Reply-To: <3F3FF917.8040903@ciam.ru>
References: <3F3FF917.8040903@ciam.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> (08.17.2003 @ 1752 PST): Sergey Matveychuk said, in 0.4K: <<
> >It was primarily written to make a smooth migration from current 2
> >levels ports tree to a hypothetic 3 levels ports tree,
>
> Question 2 portmgr: is this planned? At least hypothetical :)
>> end of "Re: RFC: patch for bsd.port.mk to use ${PORTSDIR}/MOVED" from Sergey Matveychuk <<
I think there's great merit in not making a limit to the ports tree
organizational depth.
x11/desktop_environments/gnome/stable/sysutils/gnomecontrolcenter2
x11/desktop_environments/gnome/devel/sysutils/gnomecontrolcenter2
etc. It'd be nice to put all the apache modules under one directory,
under a general apache directory, under www. Stuff like that. If we're
going to go through the work of making it 3-deep, we might as well at
least set up the code to handle n-depth.
# Adam
--
Adam Weinberger
vectors.cx >> adam@vectors.cx >> http://www.vectors.cx
magnesium.net << adamw@magnesium.net << http://www.magnesium.net/~adamw
FreeBSD >> adamw@FreeBSD.org >> http://people.freebsd.org/~adamw
#vim:set ts=8: 8-char tabs prevent tooth decay.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030817220558.GO18091>