Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 09:31:24 -0700 From: Albert Yang <albert@achtung.com> Cc: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Builds of PicoBSD Message-ID: <38ECBBDC.416550EE@achtung.com> References: <200004042058.OAA71025@harmony.village.org> <95502856401@mercury.hosting4u.net> <38ECB360.9464DE36@whetstonelogic.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'm all for the write, patch, test, feedback, make better process. But if I'm behind on reading the list, or delete an email here or there on accident, then I'm lost as all the patches go flying by. All I'm saying is, if post-patched pico disks are posted on the site, then we can ALL test them and have some sort of version control (sort of) on it. I'd hate to test something, and post it as a problem, and have someone else email me saying "This was fixed in the patch" and I reply with "which patch?" etc... That's not a good feedback cycle. Thanks for the offer Patrick. We need a lot of documentation as well.. Albert To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?38ECBBDC.416550EE>