Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 10 Jun 2003 04:58:22 -0700
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Yar Tikhiy <yar@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: FTP and command-line multiple downloads
Message-ID:  <20030610115822.GA99476@rot13.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030610115528.GH52185@comp.chem.msu.su>
References:  <20030214233406.GA3814@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030214233749.GB3888@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030215144637.GA45693@comp.chem.msu.su> <20030606131021.GA64498@comp.chem.msu.su> <20030606222802.GA49534@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030610115528.GH52185@comp.chem.msu.su>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--9amGYk9869ThD9tj
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 03:55:28PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 03:28:02PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 05:10:21PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> >=20
> > > I must admit that I overlooked this feature in lukemftp.  In fact,
> > > lukemftp can download multiple files specified as a wildcard via ftp.
> > > However, lukemftp accepts wildcards only in the "classic" ftp file
> > > specification, i.e., host:path/file, and not in URLs.
> > >=20
> > > Do you think the ability to use command-line wildcards should be
> > > extended to URLs as well?  Luke Mewburn may be convinced to do that
> > > in his ftp client.  Technically, the task is as easy as removing a
> > > single logical subexpression from an "if" statement.
> >=20
> > lukem doesn't want to change it..I suppose the difference and
> > workaround should be documented in the manpage.  I'm happy with the
> > workaround.
>=20
> As a matter of fact, the feature is documented well in the section
> AUTO-FETCHING FILES of lukem's ftp(1), though no words are said on
> how it differs from the older FreeBSD ftp client, naturally.  We
> can create a customized manpage version that will explicitly describe
> the difference.  Does it sound reasonable?

Sounds good to me!

Kris

--9amGYk9869ThD9tj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE+5cfeWry0BWjoQKURAltFAJ0e0Sf2C5VjlWwsr0ExVgLo+BrV+gCgzW5y
UpYHN3eT5hU/kHp2s5zWezk=
=2KAN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--9amGYk9869ThD9tj--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030610115822.GA99476>