Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 18 Jun 2002 19:17:44 +0200
From:      Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ATA Atapi 4.6 Release
Message-ID:  <m3adpssdzb.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020618092610.M32141-100000@vespa.dmz.orem.verio.net> (Fred Clift's message of "Tue, 18 Jun 2002 09:38:46 -0600 (MDT)")
References:  <20020618092610.M32141-100000@vespa.dmz.orem.verio.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Fred Clift <fclift@verio.net> writes:

> It appears that your bias is towards stability at the expense of
> innovation (I realize that they need not be not mutually exclusive).
> Other's bias is toward getting new features at the expense of some
> compatibility.

People don't object to innovation, but if it comes at the expense of
breaking previously-working system, then people will object: to the
regression, not to the innovation.

> One could argue that it might have been better to mfc earlier (ie right
> after 4.5-R) or wait till after 4.6-R so that the most time possible for
> working out these kinks could be used.

Looking at since when S=F8ren has been able to reproduce the problem, it
would not have helped at all.

--=20
Matthias Andree

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m3adpssdzb.fsf>