Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 29 Dec 2006 12:10:28 -0500 (EST)
From:      Andy Dills <andy@xecu.net>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Possibility for FreeBSD 4.11 Extended Support
Message-ID:  <20061229115147.Y92449@thunder.xecu.net>
In-Reply-To: <20061229154325.GA46438@freebie.xs4all.nl>
References:  <000801c723bb$efc2b540$260ba8c0@wii.wintecind.com> <576dcbc20612281645n54d78890m6a8357e9f2859346@mail.gmail.com> <20061229154325.GA46438@freebie.xs4all.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, Wilko Bulte wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 08:45:03AM +0800, lveax wrote..
> > seems there are many machines at freebsd.org network are still using
> > 4-STABLE now.
> 
> There is a mix of versions in use, upgrading is done at the discretion
> of the admins team that controls the FreeBSD.org server farm.  That in
> turn is dependent on the amount of time admins have available etc etc.
> 
> So what is the problem?

Indeed...I still run and admin a large number of 4-STABLE servers, and 
even as I'm currently in the process of deploying 6-STABLE on my own 
servers, I still regularly deploy 4-STABLE for customers of mine.

There's a lot to be said for the "why fix what isn't broken" train of 
thought. I bet there are still a decent number of 2.2.8 boxes floating 
around...perhaps there's even more to be said for version maturity in 
general. 

I was hoping to wait for 6.4-R before jumping to the 6 line, but 6.2 is 
looking pretty solid for my purposes, so it seems like a great time to 
start migrating. I'm curious if anybody else is planning to migrate a 
large number of 4-STABLE boxes to 6-STABLE as of 6.2-R.  

Andy

---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061229115147.Y92449>