Date: Sun, 2 Mar 1997 14:39:21 -0500 (EST) From: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu> To: ejs@bfd.com (Eric J. Schwertfeger) Cc: hasty@rah.star-gate.com, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RSA 56-bit key challenge Message-ID: <199703021939.OAA09955@crh.cl.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970302113017.24091A-100000@harlie.bfd.com> from "Eric J. Schwertfeger" at "Mar 2, 97 11:33:07 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>
> Is that with the precompiled binary? If so, it's optimized for the P5,
> and is actually 10% slower than the result of "make i486-gcc" on a PPro.
>
Yep, its there binary. And its faster than any build's I've done with their
source. If I build from source I get 220k/sec.
> If it is with the precompiled binary, and we could get someone to
> overclock a dual PPro to 233/233, then we might just be able to unseat the
> Dual 400Mhz alpha currently sitting at the top of the list.
-Crh
Charles Henrich Michigan State University henrich@msu.edu
http://pilot.msu.edu/~henrich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703021939.OAA09955>