Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 17:18:01 -0400 From: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> To: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@cisco.com> Cc: Will Andrews <will@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, leeym@bsd.ce.ntu.edu.tw Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/benchmarks Makefile ports/benchmarks/tmetric Makefile ports/benchmarks/tmetric/files md5 ports/benchmarks/tmetric/patches patch-aa ports/benchmarks/tmetric/pkg COMMENT DESCR PLIST Message-ID: <20000605171801.L7792@argon.gryphonsoft.com> In-Reply-To: <200006052041.e55KfMG42359@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com>; from bmah@cisco.com on Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 01:41:22PM -0700 References: <200006051325.GAA48200@freefall.freebsd.org> <200006052041.e55KfMG42359@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 01:41:22PM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > Ummm. The DESCR says that this program is "inspired by the (closed > source) pathchar utility". Both Van Jacobson's original pathchar and my > open-source version pchar are both in the net category. So for > consistency's sake, shouldn't tmetric really go into net also? See benchmarks/netperf, et al. Is there a double-standard going on here? -- Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000605171801.L7792>