Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:08:18 -0500 (CDT)
From:      Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: in recent 7-STABLE: VOP_WRITE...is not exclusive locked but should be
Message-ID:  <alpine.LFD.2.00.0903191333410.11981@cardinal>
In-Reply-To: <200903191246.05641.jhb@freebsd.org>
References:  <alpine.LFD.2.00.0903190639450.9228@cardinal> <200903191001.44491.jhb@freebsd.org> <20090319160251.GJ7716@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <200903191246.05641.jhb@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello,

Regarding:

>>>> As to the deadlock that started this exercise, if the machine follows
> its
>>>> recent pattern, that should happen within the next 2-4 hours.

FWIW, it did _not_ deadlock this morning and there haven't been any more of the 
"is exclusive locked" messages have come out, either.

John Baldwin asked:

> Hmm, it depends on where the check is I guess (before or after zfs_write()).
> Tim, can you do 'l *VOP_WRITE_APV+0x155' on your kernel from gdb?

(kgdb) l *VOP_WRITE_APV+0x155
0xffffffff8048f4b5 is in VOP_WRITE_APV (vnode_if.c:704).
699			ASSERT_VOP_ELOCKED(a->a_vp, "VOP_WRITE");
700		} else {
701			ASSERT_VI_UNLOCKED(a->a_vp, "VOP_WRITE");
702			ASSERT_VOP_ELOCKED(a->a_vp, "VOP_WRITE");
703		}
704		VOP_WRITE_POST(a, rc);
705		return (rc);
706	}
707 
708	struct vnodeop_desc vop_write_desc = {
(kgdb)

Line 704 would appear to be after the ZFS write which I guess means ZFS
is doing something it shouldn't be?

 	- Tim



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.LFD.2.00.0903191333410.11981>