Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:45:12 +0100
From:      =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Morgan_Wesstr=F6m?= <freebsd-questions@pp.dyndns.biz>
To:        Emil Mikulic <emikulic@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: immense delayed write to file system (ZFS and UFS2), performance issues
Message-ID:  <4B560BC8.4010909@pp.dyndns.biz>
In-Reply-To: <20100119165633.GA78384@dmr.ath.cx>
References:  <4B54C100.9080906@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4B54C5EE.5070305@pp.dyndns.biz> <201001191250.23625.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <7346c5c61001181841j3653a7c3m32bc033c8c146a92@mail.gmail.com> <20100119091641.cc59f03f.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> <20100119142052.GA77230@dmr.ath.cx> <4B55D092.30509@pp.dyndns.biz> <20100119165633.GA78384@dmr.ath.cx>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
Emil Mikulic wrote:
> (off-list)
> 
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 04:32:34PM +0100, Morgan Wesstr?m wrote:
>> Emil Mikulic wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 09:16:41AM +0100, Gerrit K?hn wrote:
>>>> Thanks for bringing up this topic here. I have drives showing up close to
>>>> 800000 load cycle counts here. Guess it's time for that fix... :-|
>>> Device Model:     WDC WD10EACS-00ZJB0
>>> Firmware Version: 01.01B01
>>> Serial Number:    WD-WCASxxxxxxxx
>>> [...]
>>>   9 Power_On_Hours   17046
>>> 193 Load_Cycle_Count 1045512
>>>
>>> The above drive is in a raidz of three.
>>> The other two drives from that batch have already failed.  :(
>> Did you RMA the failing drives? Did WD comment the Load_Cycle_Count?
> 
> No.  But apparently they're still under warranty, so maybe I'll give
> that a shot and let you know in ~3 weeks or so.  :)
> 
Thanks. I'd be really interested to know whether they'll make any
comments regarding that value or if they simply ignore it.
/Morgan



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B560BC8.4010909>