Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:45:12 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Morgan_Wesstr=F6m?= <freebsd-questions@pp.dyndns.biz> To: Emil Mikulic <emikulic@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: immense delayed write to file system (ZFS and UFS2), performance issues Message-ID: <4B560BC8.4010909@pp.dyndns.biz> In-Reply-To: <20100119165633.GA78384@dmr.ath.cx> References: <4B54C100.9080906@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4B54C5EE.5070305@pp.dyndns.biz> <201001191250.23625.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <7346c5c61001181841j3653a7c3m32bc033c8c146a92@mail.gmail.com> <20100119091641.cc59f03f.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> <20100119142052.GA77230@dmr.ath.cx> <4B55D092.30509@pp.dyndns.biz> <20100119165633.GA78384@dmr.ath.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Emil Mikulic wrote: > (off-list) > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 04:32:34PM +0100, Morgan Wesstr?m wrote: >> Emil Mikulic wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 09:16:41AM +0100, Gerrit K?hn wrote: >>>> Thanks for bringing up this topic here. I have drives showing up close to >>>> 800000 load cycle counts here. Guess it's time for that fix... :-| >>> Device Model: WDC WD10EACS-00ZJB0 >>> Firmware Version: 01.01B01 >>> Serial Number: WD-WCASxxxxxxxx >>> [...] >>> 9 Power_On_Hours 17046 >>> 193 Load_Cycle_Count 1045512 >>> >>> The above drive is in a raidz of three. >>> The other two drives from that batch have already failed. :( >> Did you RMA the failing drives? Did WD comment the Load_Cycle_Count? > > No. But apparently they're still under warranty, so maybe I'll give > that a shot and let you know in ~3 weeks or so. :) > Thanks. I'd be really interested to know whether they'll make any comments regarding that value or if they simply ignore it. /Morgan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B560BC8.4010909>