Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 11 May 2002 12:28:47 -0400
From:      Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: docs/37943: [PATCH] minor corrections for cutting-edge
Message-ID:  <20020511122847.3a2d1bf0.trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <200205110950.g4B9o4l33371@freefall.freebsd.org>
References:  <200205110950.g4B9o4l33371@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 11 May 2002 02:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.ORG> wrote:
 
>  > -          Pentium 3 with 128 MB of RAM takes about 2 hours to build
>  > +          Pentium III with 128 MB of RAM takes about 2 hours to build
>  
>  Is this really necessary?  I'm not saying it's wrong or something.
>  But is III the way these processors should be referred to in written
>  text?
>  
>  Giorgos Keramidas                       FreeBSD Documentation Project
>  keramida@{freebsd.org,ceid.upatras.gr}  http://www.FreeBSD.org/docproj/

Pentium III can be seen on the product box, I feel its valid.  Now,
the Pentium 4 processors use the actual 4 instead of the Romain
numbers for some reason...

-- 
Tom (Darklogik) Rhodes
www.FreeBSD.org  -The Power To Serve
www.Pittgoth.com -Pittgoth Discussion Portal
trhodes@{Pittgoth.com, FreeBSD.org}
PGP key by www:
http://www.pittgoth.com/~darklogik/darklogik.key

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020511122847.3a2d1bf0.trhodes>