Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 08:09:08 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> To: Artemiev Igor <ai@kliksys.ru> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.1-STABLE: zfs and sendfile: problem still exists Message-ID: <4CCD0804.8010703@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <20101030190120.GA80301@two.kliksys.ru> References: <4CCAF0EB.4080001@icyb.net.ua> <20101029175105.GB18613@two.kliksys.ru> <4CCBD443.7010305@icyb.net.ua> <4CCBD46E.9030200@icyb.net.ua> <4CCBD661.3000204@freebsd.org> <4CCBEAF6.2030408@freebsd.org> <20101030101254.GB79691@two.kliksys.ru> <4CCBF45C.4080208@icyb.net.ua> <20101030112520.GD79691@two.kliksys.ru> <4CCC2F2A.7020809@icyb.net.ua> <20101030190120.GA80301@two.kliksys.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 30/10/2010 22:01 Artemiev Igor said the following: > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 05:43:54PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> I apologize for my haste, it should have been VM_ALLOC_WIRED. > > Ok, applied and tested under some load(~1200 active connections, outgoing > ~80MB/s). Patch work as expected and i has noted no side effects. Just one > question - should grow Active memory counter, if some pages is "hot"(during > multiple sendfile on one file)? Pages used by sendfile are marked as Inactive for faster reclamation on demand. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CCD0804.8010703>