Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:11:39 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: Jos Chrispijn <ports@webrz.net> Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Portmanager vs portupgrade Message-ID: <20140123131139.GQ2951@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <52E0FE75.9010504@webrz.net> References: <52E0FE75.9010504@webrz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > I lately read more often that Portmaster is preferred about portupdate. > Can you tell me why this is? I know that portupdate is Ruby driven, but > furthermore I cannot detect the real advantages one above the other? I use portupgrade to do daily rebuilds of ports on 8 reference hosts. It's not perfect, but it does its job. If one port does not build, portupgrade still builds those that do build. Which is nice 8-) -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 6 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140123131139.GQ2951>