Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 20:52:25 -0700 From: Carl Johnson <carlj@peak.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Handbook, upgrading ports incorrect with 10.0-RELEASE? Message-ID: <87k3aw4j5y.fsf@oak.localnet> In-Reply-To: <4634538.SMM6loVsS1@amd.asgard.uk> (dgmm's message of "Thu, 10 Apr 2014 22:49:06 %2B0100") References: <534520DE.5060005@relst.nl> <534565E9.8080109@relst.nl> <0558889B-6B6C-40E2-95DD-70DDA98B51F4@gmail.com> <4634538.SMM6loVsS1@amd.asgard.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
dgmm <freebsd01@dgmm.net> writes: > On Wednesday 09 April 2014 10:52:57 Matthew Pherigo wrote: >> So you really want just to see the versions, and then you upgrade them by >> hand. In that case, the correct option would indeed be "pkg version". > > pkg version is so sloooooow > > I use portversion from portupgrade package. It's much, much faster. > > portversion -l \< > > or > > portversion -L = I usually compare against the pkg repository with 'pkg version -RL=', or you could compare against the INDEX file with 'pkg version -IL='. -- Carl Johnson carlj@peak.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87k3aw4j5y.fsf>