Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2018 17:01:02 -0400 From: Charles Sprickman <spork@bway.net> To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Cc: Pete Wright <pete@nomadlogic.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bad hash in repo Message-ID: <1D6718B0-829B-4E81-B7FD-41E4B37D6B01@bway.net> In-Reply-To: <m2tvn8qirq.wl-randy@psg.com> References: <m24lftov3m.wl-randy@psg.com> <m2zhxegyro.wl-randy@psg.com> <40cbc4e4-c0c8-e9f7-ba88-48dc226b032a@nomadlogic.org> <m2y3cxg6o4.wl-randy@psg.com> <m236utrvol.wl-randy@psg.com> <8C150C27-844D-4F32-907B-8ABD7D711846@bway.net> <m2wos4rfz8.wl-randy@psg.com> <m2tvn8qirq.wl-randy@psg.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Sep 2, 2018, at 6:46 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote: >=20 > someone asked if the failures were limited to update5.freebsd.org >=20 > today's batch were both 4 and 5 Is there any possibility there=E2=80=99s something between these you and = these update hosts? This thread has some interesting info, but specifically, note the = description of how phttpget works at the bottom - it is NOT at all picky = about what it receives, and seems to have some quirks: = https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2015-December/083882.ht= ml = <https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2015-December/083882.h= tml> Charles > randy > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1D6718B0-829B-4E81-B7FD-41E4B37D6B01>