Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 20 Jun 1997 07:12:10 +0200
From:      j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch)
To:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: xperfmon++ problem (again)
Message-ID:  <19970620071210.TQ58637@uriah.heep.sax.de>
In-Reply-To: <19970620115409.62437@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au>; from David Dawes on Jun 20, 1997 11:54:09 %2B1000
References:  <19970620111839.40700@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au> <Pine.BSF.3.95.970619184512.12613H-100000@opus.cts.cwu.edu> <19970620115409.62437@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As David Dawes wrote:

>   I would argue that if -pipe is a
> big win in all situations, it should be turned on by default in gcc
> itself.

It will have a speed impact on small-memory machines.

Now of course, if we could make the XFree86 templates pick up the
setting for CFLAGS from /etc/make.conf ;-), but i figure that's not
possible, due to the name conflict and the way the X11 templates build
up their own CFLAGS.

-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970620071210.TQ58637>