Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 15:13:38 -0700 From: bmah@cisco.com (Bruce A. Mah) To: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> Cc: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@cisco.com>, Will Andrews <will@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, leeym@bsd.ce.ntu.edu.tw Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/benchmarks Makefile ports/benchmarks/tmetric Makefile ports/benchmarks/tmetric/files md5 ports/benchmarks/tmetric/patches patch-aa ports/benchmarks/tmetric/pkg COMMENT DESCR PLIST Message-ID: <200006052213.e55MDdp73687@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <20000605171801.L7792@argon.gryphonsoft.com> References: <200006051325.GAA48200@freefall.freebsd.org> <200006052041.e55KfMG42359@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> <20000605171801.L7792@argon.gryphonsoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
If memory serves me right, Will Andrews wrote: > On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 01:41:22PM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > > Ummm. The DESCR says that this program is "inspired by the (closed > > source) pathchar utility". Both Van Jacobson's original pathchar and my > > open-source version pchar are both in the net category. So for > > consistency's sake, shouldn't tmetric really go into net also? > > See benchmarks/netperf, et al. > > Is there a double-standard going on here? I don't know, honestly. If there is, it isn't clear to me who's benefitting from it. :-p Bruce. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200006052213.e55MDdp73687>