Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:49:24 -0500 From: Chris Ross <cross+freebsd@distal.com> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-fs@freebsd.org" <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>, Kurt Lidl <lidl@pix.net>, "freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org" <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>, Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> Subject: Re: Changes to kern.geom.debugflags? Message-ID: <315EDE17-4995-4819-BC82-E9B7D942E82A@distal.com> In-Reply-To: <50F82846.6030104@FreeBSD.org> References: <7AA0B5D0-D49C-4D5A-8FA0-AA57C091C040@distal.com> <6A0C1005-F328-4C4C-BB83-CA463BD85127@distal.com> <20121225232507.GA47735@alchemy.franken.de> <8D01A854-97D9-4F1F-906A-7AB59BF8850B@distal.com> <A947C892-5379-4F70-BFA0-0A7AB94DF0C6@distal.com> <6FC4189B-85FA-466F-AA00-C660E9C16367@distal.com> <20121230032403.GA29164@pix.net> <56B28B8A-2284-421D-A666-A21F995C7640@distal.com> <EEB60849-3192-46E2-8626-EC6824182515@distal.com> <20130104234616.GA37999@alchemy.franken.de> <BD3E2E30-457F-4D8A-8057-3ECED966419F@distal.com> <D3EE961A-D099-4CA9-9B2B-B69E171B95F1@distal.com> <50F82846.6030104@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jan 17, 2013, at 11:35 , Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> wrote:
> on 08/01/2013 03:53 Chris Ross said the following:
>>=20
>> Out of curiosity, I did try 242229. It boots. So. the problem =
occurred with 242230, which=20
>> came from 241289. FYI.
>=20
> Chris,
>=20
> thank you for triaging and analyzing this problem. And sorry for the =
long delay
> (caused by the New Year craziness you mentioned earlier).
>=20
> The problem is that arch_zfs_probe methods are expected only to probe =
for ZFS
> disks/partitions, but they are not allowed to execute any other ZFS =
operations.
> I assumed this to be true and forgot to check sparc64_zfs_probe. Mea =
culpa.
>=20
> Could you please test the following patch?
Thank you, Andriy. Much as you'd expect, that patch solves the =
problem. I get some
of the printf()s that I'd put into zfs_fmtdev(), and the system loads =
successfully.
Please commit that patch, and if you could, change the comment just =
below the last
portion of it that is now not quite accurate (since you moved mentioned =
code).
Thanks again! How long will this take to get to stable/9? Being new =
to FreeBSD,
I'm not too familiar with the process of HEAD/stable/etc. (In NetBSD, =
it would be a
commit followed by a pull request.)
- Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?315EDE17-4995-4819-BC82-E9B7D942E82A>