Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 20:32:56 +1000 (EST) From: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au> To: eischen@vigrid.com (Daniel Eischen) Cc: dfr@nlsystems.com, jb@cimlogic.com.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Debugging uthreads Message-ID: <199905121032.UAA26267@cimlogic.com.au> In-Reply-To: <199905121016.GAA08837@pcnet1.pcnet.com> from Daniel Eischen at "May 12, 1999 6:16:46 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel Eischen wrote: > Why don't we make a libc_r_db and provide the necessary interfaces to > gdb from that instead of having gdb know about uthread internals? It would still mean that gdb would be linked to the uthread internals which may not match the version of libc_r that the 3rd party program was linked against. -- John Birrell - jb@cimlogic.com.au; jb@freebsd.org http://www.cimlogic.com.au/ CIMlogic Pty Ltd, GPO Box 117A, Melbourne Vic 3001, Australia +61 418 353 137 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199905121032.UAA26267>