Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 14 Dec 2008 23:47:19 -0700
From:      Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors
Message-ID:  <20081215064719.GL5527@kokopelli.hydra>
In-Reply-To: <1229229078.18610.80.camel@laptop2.herveybayaustralia.com.au>
References:  <20081212002813.GD32300@kokopelli.hydra> <20081211170011.777236f8@gom.home> <20081212015814.GB32982@kokopelli.hydra> <20081212120437.B3687@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081212181258.GE36348@kokopelli.hydra> <ghuau9$juk$1@ger.gmane.org> <20081212203202.H4803@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081212150228.520ad7f8@scorpio> <20081212212931.F5072@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <1229229078.18610.80.camel@laptop2.herveybayaustralia.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--z9sQuz+HmDh2hVO4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 02:31:17PM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
>=20
> What I can't equate with is why its acceptable for intel to do the
> same... check if_iwi and its "firmware". No other wifi device (that I'm
> aware of- at least they'd be in the minority anyway) works this way. The
> excuse is fcc regs- I doubt that...

Atheros drivers used closed firmware until very recently.  Some of them
still do.


>=20
> And before anyone defends intel: I've spent a lot of time wasted on
> making their stupid nics to work in windows, I usually just flick em and
> put in a rl nic. The cpus are shit as well- I've had no end of trouble
> with them, plus too hot, power hungry etc. Alas, finding a decent
> notebook with an alternative has been to no avail...

Actually, Pentium M processors may well be the best x86-compatible CPUs
of their generation -- low power consumption relative to the competition,
and the best performance per dollar in their class.  Pentium 4, though,
certainly sucks.

The first generation of Celeron processors were kick-ass x86-compatible
CPUs for their time, too -- actually better than Intel intended them to
be.  Weird how that happens.

--=20
Chad Perrin [ content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
Quoth William Gibson: "The future is already here.  It's just not very
evenly distributed."

--z9sQuz+HmDh2hVO4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAklF/XcACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKXyEQCeLsJxzy18dRfmMNXrMuLcJjFr
/m4Anjt76A0NfhlqNhMR5AEKeg9WJf/W
=OfOF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--z9sQuz+HmDh2hVO4--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081215064719.GL5527>