Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 1 Sep 1997 15:58:28 -0300 (EST)
From:      Joao Carlos Mendes Luis <jonny@mailhost.coppe.ufrj.br>
To:        jhay@mikom.csir.co.za (John Hay)
Cc:        jonny@mailhost.coppe.ufrj.br, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: IPX problems
Message-ID:  <199709011858.PAA08958@gaia.coppe.ufrj.br>
In-Reply-To: <199709011630.SAA28625@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za> from John Hay at "Sep 1, 97 06:30:18 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
#define quoting(John Hay)
// >   Here's an output of my ifconfig:
// > 
// ...
// > vx0: flags=8a43<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,ALLMULTI,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
// > 	inet 146.164.63.4 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 146.164.63.255
// > 	ipx 92a43f00.60H 
// > 	ether 00:60:97:a7:ab:42 
// ...
// > 
// > Why does the vx0 interface gets the .60H node address instead of 006097a7ab42 ?
// 
// I would guess that it is because the vx driver define struct vx_softc
// with something before struct arpcom. As far as I know it should start
// its structure with "struct arpcom", because the arp code and also
// ether_ioctl depends on it being right at the beginning. Try moving
// "struct arpcom arpcom" to before "int unit" in "struct vx_softc" in
// the file sys/dev/vx/if_vx_reg.h.

It works.  Thanks.

May someone commit this to RELENG_2_2 ?

===========================================================================
--- dev/vx/if_vxreg.h.old       Mon Sep  1 15:53:31 1997
+++ dev/vx/if_vxreg.h   Mon Sep  1 15:44:09 1997
@@ -49,8 +49,8 @@
  * Ethernet software status per interface.
  */
 struct vx_softc {
-    int unit;                  /* unit number */
     struct arpcom arpcom;      /* Ethernet common part         */
+    int unit;                  /* unit number */
     u_int vx_io_addr;          /* i/o bus address              */
 #define MAX_MBS  8             /* # of mbufs we keep around    */
     struct mbuf *mb[MAX_MBS];  /* spare mbuf storage.          */
===========================================================================

Anyway, John, isn't it wrong to assume relative positions of data
in a struct ?

// 
// John
// -- 
// John Hay -- John.Hay@mikom.csir.co.za
// 


					Jonny

--
Joao Carlos Mendes Luis			jonny@gta.ufrj.br
+55 21 290-4698				jonny@coppe.ufrj.br
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro	UFRJ/COPPE/CISI
PGP fingerprint: 29 C0 50 B9 B6 3E 58 F2  83 5F E3 26 BF 0F EA 67



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709011858.PAA08958>