Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:31:48 +0400 From: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> To: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com>, Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Migration to new SourceForge url scheme now inevitable, solution Message-ID: <20090821123148.GC9771@hades.panopticon> In-Reply-To: <1250838378.89497.1.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> References: <20090820023314.GF1295@hades.panopticon> <4A8CCC24.8050605@p6m7g8.com> <6B974976DD234EF08949F6A8@utd65257.utdallas.edu> <20090820164036.GA12998@hades.panopticon> <1250790054.45433.0.camel@hood.oook.cz> <20090821035021.GA9771@hades.panopticon> <1250838378.89497.1.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Pav Lucistnik (pav@FreeBSD.org) wrote: > > [1] http://people.freebsd.org/~amdmi3/sfp.patch > > [2] http://people.freebsd.org/~amdmi3/sfp.log > > This looks good so far. > > > PS. Btw, SOURCEFORGE_EXTENDED and SOURCEFORGE_JP still use an old > > scheme. Because of that SFE can no longer include SF, and honestly, I > > JP is completely separate thing, so I'd leave it alone for now. Yep, thought so. > SF_E can be axed if all the files fetch from regular SF. IIRC there were > some projects in the past that were only distributed on SF_E sites, not > on SF sites? Comment in sites.mk gives an idea that all project are hosted on SF, while some are also hosted on SFE, like itetcu says. I'm planning to check this (and likely move SFE ports to SF) after SF patch is committed. -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amdmi3@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amdmi3@jabber.ru http://www.amdmi3.ru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090821123148.GC9771>