Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 04:10:15 GMT From: Alexander Botero-Lowry <alex@complete-systems.net> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: conf/84030: [patch] /etc/rc.d/power_profile is not a real rc.d script Message-ID: <200507260410.j6Q4AFpr019745@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR conf/84030; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Alexander Botero-Lowry <alex@complete-systems.net> To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, drax@stampede.org, brooks@one-eyed-alien.net Cc: Subject: Re: conf/84030: [patch] /etc/rc.d/power_profile is not a real rc.d script Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:06:49 -0700 That's fine. But still /etc/rc.d/dhclient complies with section 4.2.3 of Design and Implementation of the NetBSD rc.d system. I don't have a -CURRENT or -BETA box so I can't say about /etc/rc.d/wpa_supplicant. Maybe scripts related to devd should get /etc/dev.d or something? I really can't say the answer to this I just know that /etc/rc.d/power_profile doesn't belong and it's not because it's a non-startup script. It doesn't belong because it doesn't follow section 4.2.3 of the document that defines how rc .d scripts that derive from the NetBSD system are supposed to work. Alexander [drax@stampede.org, I had the mail bounce so I'm using another account]
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200507260410.j6Q4AFpr019745>