Date: 16 Jun 2003 20:45:17 +0200 From: "clemens fischer" <ino-qc@spotteswoode.de.eu.org> To: "Ben Pfountz" <netprince@vt.edu> Cc: sahafeez@edgefocus.com Subject: Re: ipfw, dummynet and a large subnet to shape Message-ID: <ptldn9oi.fsf@ID-23066.news.dfncis.de> In-Reply-To: <003501c3342c$31658cd0$0100a8c0@GELLMAN> (Ben Pfountz's message of "Mon, 16 Jun 2003 13:24:35 -0400") References: <3EEDE099.9080603@edgefocus.com> <001101c33420$37493bd0$6511a8c0@benspiece> <3EEDEF1D.9080107@edgefocus.com> <002401c33428$72b2c300$0100a8c0@GELLMAN> <3EEDFB2D.8070104@edgefocus.com> <003501c3342c$31658cd0$0100a8c0@GELLMAN>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Ben Pfountz: > It looks like it should work, but you should always try it. I have almost > never written a firewall ruleset that worked the way I expected it to work > on the first try. You should take a laptop and become a wireless client, > then try to download something with a reliably high download rate. Then you > should go to one of your client machines on the LAN and try to download > something as well. You could even reduce the bandwidth rate just for > testing, for example 56Kbit/s. This would help to prove whether or not the > pipes are working. ... and post the ruleset that works, please ... clemens
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ptldn9oi.fsf>