Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 13 Dec 2011 20:23:29 -0800
From:      Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@crodrigues.org>
To:        Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Sean Bruno <seanbru@yahoo-inc.com>, Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>
Subject:   Re: NFS + SVN problem?
Message-ID:  <CAG=rPVdq2YgRC5_LrtXqFovFwq3vCvq0HrEaQ=jrZkLhgFwCqw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EE70514.1040907@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <465660264.237830.1322071102401.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> <1322072781.12047.4.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <4EE70514.1040907@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> A very late addition to this: I got Subversion 1.7 to work properly over
> NFSv3, by making sure rpc.lockd runs on both server and client.
>
> E.g, set rpc_lockd_enable to YES in rc.conf; this is off by default,
> even if you have nfs_client_enable/nfs_server_enable set to YES.
> _______________________________________________

If nfs_client_enable or nfs_server_enable are set to YES, does
is it reasonable to have rpc_lockd_enable default to YES, unless
the user explicitly sets it to NO in their /etc/rc.conf?

-- 
Craig Rodrigues
rodrigc@crodrigues.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAG=rPVdq2YgRC5_LrtXqFovFwq3vCvq0HrEaQ=jrZkLhgFwCqw>