Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 5 Sep 2001 13:30:46 -0600
From:      Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>
To:        John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org, nate@yogotech.com
Subject:   Re: local changes to CVS tree
Message-ID:  <15254.32102.836154.871291@nomad.yogotech.com>
In-Reply-To: <200109051925.f85JPce08130@vashon.polstra.com>
References:  <20010905131027.A5476@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> <200109051723.f85HNbl07385@vashon.polstra.com> <3B967827.F166E3A6@mindspring.com> <15254.31457.818766.916542@nomad.yogotech.com> <200109051925.f85JPce08130@vashon.polstra.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > Any chance of getting CVSup to transfer from a remote repository
> > > to a local vendor branch, instead of from a remote repository to
> > > a local repository?
> > 
> > The problem is that you aren't just transferring bits from the HEAD, but
> > from multiple active branches.  As John already stated, CVS doesn't
> > handle multiple 'vendor' branches well (and in this case, the FreeBSD
> > tree has vendor (CSRG) branches, FreeBSD vendor branches (RELENG_2,
> > RELENG_3, ..., contrib vendor branches (TCSH, GCC, etc..)
> > 
> > CVS is simply not setup to do what you ask. :(
> 
> No, Terry's idea is sound as long as you only try to track one branch
> of FreeBSD.

So, you're saying that the person would choose the branch (which may be
RELENG_4 *OR* HEAD).  I can see how that would work for RELENG_4, but
for the HEAD, many of the files on the HEAD in /usr/src/contrib are on
vendor branches, which means it would be a *nightmare* to get that right
(IMO).

> I.e., you consider FreeBSD to be your vendor, and you do
> a checkout-mode type of fetch from a branch of the FreeBSD repository
> and directly import it onto your own vendor branch.  This would meet
> the needs of a lot of people, e.g., companies who make products based
> on FreeBSD.

Agreed.  Although, it may not be as useful to developers, who often have
to track development in multiple branches (for MFC's).

> I have had this on my to-do list for a long time, but I have no idea
> if or when it'll ever get implemented.  It would require a focused
> period of working on it that I just don't have these days.  Maybe if
> the economy gets worse ...

*sigh* Let's hope it doesn't come down to that.



Nate

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15254.32102.836154.871291>