Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2003 09:07:05 -0400 From: "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org> To: Paul Robinson <paul@iconoplex.co.uk>, "Jason C. Wells" <jcw@highperformance.net> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The Old Way Was Better Message-ID: <3F5AF539.30300.EE6367F@localhost> In-Reply-To: <3F5B239A.3020400@iconoplex.co.uk> References: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0309070044200.75233-100000@s1.stradamotorsports.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7 Sep 2003 at 13:24, Paul Robinson wrote: > Jason C. Wells wrote: > > >I would like to cast my vote for returning to the old release method. > >Please don't call the next major version of FreeBSD a release until it is > >truly ready to be a release. > > For what it's worth, I and a large number of other people I know would > agree. The 5.x releases so far have been VERY badly received with the > people I've spoken to and it's not done FBSD any favours. The instructions and precautions for early adoptors are clearly defined. 5.* is not ready for production. That is widely known. 5.* is still -current, not -stable. Those running -current need to be aware of the issues. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F5AF539.30300.EE6367F>