Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 30 Jan 1998 16:25:22 -0500 (EST)
From:      "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net>
To:        ade@demon.net
Cc:        dyson@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Current and X11R6 3.3 get Signal 11 abort
Message-ID:  <199801302125.QAA03713@dyson.iquest.net>
In-Reply-To: <E0xyGk7-0000QQ-00@sphinx.lovett.com> from Ade Lovett at "Jan 30, 98 07:44:27 am"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ade Lovett said:
> "John S. Dyson" writes:
> >
> >Good!!!  It is wise to be prepared to back-off to the latest "stable" -current,
> >when breakage like I have likely caused, happens!!!
> 
> Thing is, though.  After your suggested boot-time tweak to set
> vfs.ioopt to 0, I've had no problems with random SIGBUS's, to the
> extent that I've completely rebuilt a couple of machines (a 96Mb K6/200
> and a 128Mb dual-P133) from scratch, including X11 and all the other
> ports that I use.
> 
> I notice that recent -current's (I'm using 980127 here) seem to set
> vfs.ioopt to 0 by themselves (negating the need for the sysctl in /etc/rc)
> Is this just a kludge to revert back to old (unbroken?) behavior
> (the previous problematic value was 2)?
> 
Yes.  I still am having problems figuring out the trouble.  Right now,
I am busy working on things specifically for work.  (We are using
another OS at work also, and it is giving us fits...)

-- 
John                  | Never try to teach a pig to sing,
dyson@freebsd.org     | it just makes you look stupid,
jdyson@nc.com         | and it irritates the pig.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199801302125.QAA03713>