Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 22:14:41 -0500 From: Glenn Johnson <glennpj@charter.net> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>, "Timur I. Bakeyev" <timur@com.bat.ru>, FreeBSD GNOME Users <gnome@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: GDM2 no longer works with -current Message-ID: <20030509031441.GA61214@gforce.johnson.home> In-Reply-To: <20030509025901.GB38554@gforce.johnson.home> References: <20030507170618.Q62863@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20030508020559.GA27322@gforce.johnson.home> <1052361604.68744.1.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20030508123135.GA94967@gforce.johnson.home> <1052406971.308.16.camel@gyros> <20030508212956.A68076@bat.ru> <1052426796.326.49.camel@gyros> <20030508230127.A68554@bat.ru> <1052427919.326.55.camel@gyros> <20030509025901.GB38554@gforce.johnson.home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 09:59:01PM -0500, Glenn Johnson wrote: > On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 05:05:19PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > On Thu, 2003-05-08 at 17:01, Timur I. Bakeyev wrote: > > > > > On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 04:46:36PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > > > > > Are you using ULE? Can you send me your kernel config? > > > > > > I'm using: > > > > > > FreeBSD timur.home.bat.ru 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD > > > 5.0-CURRENT #1: Mon May 5 19:49:0 5 CEST 2003 > > > root@timur.home.bat.ru:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/SMP i386 > > > > > > Which is a stock SMP config, coming right from CVS. Basically, > > > GENERIC with SMP support on. > > > > > > I'm recompiling system now, cause I noticed, that Glenn's one is > > > build one day after mine - maybe, we were unlucky to get something > > > broken? > > > > > > Will report about the result. > > > > If that doesn't work, try disabling SMP, and see if that helps. I'm > > running an UP kernel. > > I am running a UP system here with SCHED_4BSD. This is on my home > system which is why it has taken me so long to get back to you. I ran a ktrace on the process. It seems to make a lot of calls to gettimeofday but maybe that is not unusual. It also reads /etc/pam.d/other after reading /etc/pam.d/gdm. Should that be? It seems like the information in /etc/pam.d/gdm should be sufficient. -- Glenn Johnson glennpj@charter.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030509031441.GA61214>