Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 09:40:33 -0400 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: Brad Fleming <bdflemin@gmail.com> Cc: cperiva@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Potential Doc Mistake Message-ID: <44ha60t25q.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <CF43A967-0328-4B52-8A20-477175F1A782@gmail.com> (Brad Fleming's message of "Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:55:26 -0500") References: <DEE55AA1-986C-465C-9009-50ED3E91205C@gmail.com> <44wqex5czr.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <CF43A967-0328-4B52-8A20-477175F1A782@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brad Fleming <bdflemin@gmail.com> writes: > On Apr 10, 2014, at 12:08 PM, Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-= well.ilk.org> wrote: > >> Brad Fleming <bdflemin@gmail.com> writes: >>=20 >>> I think this document might have syntax error: >>> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.h= tml >>>=20 >>> Under "23.2.3.2. Performing the Upgrade=94 the first command listed is: >>> "freebsd-update -r 9.1-RELEASE upgrade=94 >>> but I believe the proper command should be: >>> "freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.1-RELEASE=94 >>> (the =93upgrade=94 is in the wrong place) >>>=20 >>> I could certainly be wrong but the second command is what=92s referenced >>> in other documents and was required for me to move from 9.2 to 10.0. >>=20 >> The manual page actually lists options before the subcommand. A quick >> look at the source makes me think that either order is fine. > The command as listed fails on my 9.2-RELEASE VM. But perhaps that=92s > different in other versions. In either case I=92m not a Free BSD master > and could certainly be wrong. Unfortunately, I didn't have time to really look at this closely, so it's probably me that's wrong. I'll leave a note to myself to dive in if I get a chance, but it would be better if someone else gave it a look.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44ha60t25q.fsf>