Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 15:14:49 -0400 From: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Satoshi Asami <asami@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.sites.mk bsd.port.mk Message-ID: <20000618151449.A452@argon.gryphonsoft.com> In-Reply-To: <20000618114423.A69372@hub.freebsd.org>; from obrien@FreeBSD.org on Sun, Jun 18, 2000 at 11:44:23AM -0700 References: <200006140214.TAA22236@freefall.freebsd.org> <20000618114423.A69372@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jun 18, 2000 at 11:44:23AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > Can this be backed out? MASTER_SITE_SOURCEFORGE contains only two > entires -- both of which are the sourceforge.net machine, just both FTP > and HTTP protocols. You should have spoke up a long time ago, when Maxim proposed this addition. Now you're asking for another very large diff for little or no benefit. You shouldn't go and change your ports just because you disagree with the now-standard changes. You had your chance to oppose it. > The *big* advantage is one can look at a port's Makefile and cut-n-past > the master site to check up on the distfile. Today there is an extra > indirection thru bsd.sites.mk. And this is missed how, when you can simply use ``make fetch''? -- Will Andrews <andrewsw@purdue.edu> <will@FreeBSD.org> GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000618151449.A452>