Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 18:54:43 -0800 From: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> To: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Jim Davis <jdavis@CS.Arizona.EDU>, "Stefan Schablowski" <stefan.schablowski@prolificx.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/krb5 Makefile Message-ID: <200701150254.l0F2sh9S008241@cwsys.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: Message from Cy Schubert <cy@FreeBSD.org> of "Sun, 14 Jan 2007 05:13:32 GMT." <200701140513.l0E5DX9w038711@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200701140513.l0E5DX9w038711@repoman.freebsd.org>, Cy Schubert write s: > cy 2007-01-14 05:13:32 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > security/krb5 Makefile > Log: > Include new documentation dependencies. > > Conditionally build and install documentation using a new knob. > > Revision Changes Path > 1.109 +12 -2 ports/security/krb5/Makefile I've received a couple of complaints so far from folks who aren't enamoured with the fact that texinfo or teTeX, and dvips are required to build the MIT KRB5 port. I've put a knob in the port to disable building and installing MIT's KRB5 documentation. Do people prefer to have the documentation installed by default with MIT KRB5 or would folks rather have the documentation only installed when specified in a make option? -- Cheers, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> FreeBSD UNIX: <cy@FreeBSD.org> Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org e**(i*pi)+1=0
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200701150254.l0F2sh9S008241>