Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 31 Jan 2010 09:39:38 +0000
From:      James Mansion <james@mansionfamily.plus.com>
To:        Pieter de Goeje <pieter@degoeje.nl>
Cc:        freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: OpenJDK 6/7 kqueue based NIO provider
Message-ID:  <4B654FDA.7070603@mansionfamily.plus.com>
In-Reply-To: <201001301958.59731.pieter@degoeje.nl>
References:  <201001301816.16987.pieter@degoeje.nl> <be800d231001301015x6cb564ednce1fdb8a6380a2cb@mail.gmail.com> <201001301958.59731.pieter@degoeje.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pieter de Goeje wrote:
> From a cursory read of the code it can be seen that the existing Sun 
> implementations (even the shared part of the code) assumes poll like 
> back-ends. This is not a very good match for kqueue because it differs (in a 
>   
Would it be worth looking at an implementation that uses libev or libevent?

James




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B654FDA.7070603>