Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:14:28 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org> To: Garrett Cooper <yanefbsd@gmail.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@coreland.ath.cx, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days Message-ID: <20100420191428.1447931e@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <h2o7d6fde3d1004191740xb8ee9e34mbc19acadc4ecb8d3@mail.gmail.com> References: <20100328163828.1f34e0e7@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20100420021420.22e22136@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20100419233858.GC43612@logik.internal.network> <h2o7d6fde3d1004191740xb8ee9e34mbc19acadc4ecb8d3@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/2Uvyna7zchllsg7Vrw07iiU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:40:35 -0700 Garrett Cooper <yanefbsd@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:38 PM, <freebsd-ports@coreland.ath.cx> > wrote: > > On 2010-04-20 02:14:20, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > >> A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed. > >> > >> I'm still investigating lang/gnat-gcc44. > > > > As far as I know, the gnat-gcc44 bootstrap binaries will be > > fine as they're bundled with the libgmp library that was used > > to build them. Whether gcc builds with the newer libgmp remains > > to be seen... >=20 > As discussed in the QAT emails, it might be related to ccache use > on the build cluster graciously donated by ixSystems, and the fact > that the cached data is inconsistently distributed across the cluster. ATM no, the new cluster is in works, not yet used, QAT is running on a single machine, with ccache. > I've provided some tips for itetcu to work around this on IRC > (basically disable ccache), but it kind of sucks when you run into > periodic issues with toolchain variance like this, s.t. building with > NO_CACHE=3Dyes is a necessary evil to work through end-to-end build > functional issues.=20 Problem is I need an automated solution. I'm testing it now on QAT with ccache disabled. > Someone else who knows more about ccache could provide a better > explanation of what's going on because my ranting about this would > only be me talking out of my rear :). Yes, please. > More info about ccache with FreeBSD can be found here: > http://forums.freebsd.org/archive/index.php/t-174.html Thanks. --=20 IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B --Sig_/2Uvyna7zchllsg7Vrw07iiU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkvN0uUACgkQJ7GIuiH/oeVkywCeLWcmV54/Q8vniBAMow8R+12C dwEAn3JW+U3xVWFXYPQfL67EVDz2t2eD =xHjw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/2Uvyna7zchllsg7Vrw07iiU--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100420191428.1447931e>