Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Jul 1999 00:44:13 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>
To:        Tim Tsai <tim@futuresouth.com>
Cc:        hardware@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Fibre Channel Controller [ LONG RESPONSE ]
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.9907140042470.10471-100000@semuta.feral.com>
In-Reply-To: <19990714010440.A11885@futuresouth.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> > The switch configuration *can* work (it's early days for the code I put
> > in), but all that really does is join together multiple loops such that if
> > I query the Fabric name server and get list of disks back, I can 'map'
> > them to loop ID's such that the Qlogic knows they're not on the local
> > loop. This picture looks like, e.g.:
> 
>   Actually I mentioned the switch because as far as I know you can
> configure it in such a way that the host will never see disks that it's
> not intended for.  That should isolate the hosts from each other even if
> FC id's go in and out?  It is analogous to VLAN on ethernet.

I believe you're referring to a Brocade feature- zoning. It's possible
that other switches have that feature too. 

> 
>   We will probably look into that again soon.  We need [HW] RAID on a
> handful of machines and I would rather spend the money on a couple of good
> storage arrays instead of buying one for each machine.  NFS is out for
> our environment.
> 
>   Would you happen to have a host-independent (stand-alone) FC RAID
> controller that you can recommend?

Not that I know well enough to swear by.

-matt




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9907140042470.10471-100000>