Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 22:37:54 +0000 From: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> Cc: Tomas Svensson <tsn@gbdev.net>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD performing worse than Linux? Message-ID: <20011228223754.E1238@tao.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.30.0112281734020.92969-100000@niwun.pair.com>; from silby@silby.com on Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 05:36:22PM -0500 References: <20011228192736.A22545@simba.systemteknik.net> <Pine.BSF.4.30.0112281734020.92969-100000@niwun.pair.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--bi5JUZtvcfApsciF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 05:36:22PM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote: >=20 > I'd have to agree. I just recompiled libssh / sshd so that NODELAY would > not be set in any case, and ls acts a lot more nicely over a modem link. > (2 large updates, rather than lots of tiny ones.) I'm not sure that we're > seeing any actual bug in the tcp stack here as much as the effect of > packet loss and tinygrams. >=20 Packet loss is, or should be, next to zero as both machines are on an uncongested 10base ether on my local network. Joe --bi5JUZtvcfApsciF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjws9EEACgkQXVIcjOaxUBYPZACgsfRhjOj0C5eMlepicdPvxCCk l7kAnA82hxO2zRRnSnyB5vAFANM6XSmX =GYzu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bi5JUZtvcfApsciF-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011228223754.E1238>