Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 07:38:45 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>, bde@FreeBSD.org, Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: lp64 vs lp32 printf Message-ID: <20021010143845.GA1448@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20021010093021.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <20021009220522.GA65943@dragon.nuxi.com> <XFMail.20021010093021.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 05:17:20PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > I'm not sure if I like 'H'. It's closer to the floating point > specifiers > [EFG] than to the hex specifiers [xX]. On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 09:30:21AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > Perhaps "%y" instead of %H? It's closer to %x and was somewhat agreed upon > earlier. I was looking for something actually implied what the thing does. It took too much digging to figure out what it meant. That is why I picked 'H' for Hex. Does anyone have a more suggestive letter than y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021010143845.GA1448>