Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 12:06:46 -0300 From: Diego Linke - GAMK <linke@calnet.com.br> To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I have four ideia for IPFW2 Message-ID: <20030715120646.03f26167.linke@calnet.com.br> In-Reply-To: <20030715004113.A99565@xorpc.icir.org> References: <3F132237.4010604@freebsdbrasil.com.br> <20030715004113.A99565@xorpc.icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
> There is already room in the O_LOG command header so we do not need
> to modify ip_fw[2].h to add a field in the structure (helps with
> binary compatibility). In fact, this would allow different levels of
> verbosity in the logs.
I am sorry Luigi, but i not understand!
We have that to modify struct ipfw_insn_log, to pass one flag saying that one determined rule has log extended.
We add an variable for indentify extended logs per rule. See:
typedef struct _ipfw_insn_log {
ipfw_insn o;
u_int32_t max_log; /* how many do we log -- 0 = all */
u_int32_t log_left; /* how many left to log */
u_int32_t extended; /* Extended logs */
} ipfw_insn_log;
I do not understand how make this without modify ip_fw.h file.
Do you have some idea ?
Thanks
--
[ Diego Linke - GAMK ]
System/Network/Security Administrator
E-Mail/Site: gamk@gamk.com.br - http://www.gamk.com.br
Public Key: http://www.gamk.com.br/gamk.asc
Phone Number: (+5541) 9967-3464
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030715120646.03f26167.linke>