Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 Feb 2003 18:22:10 +0100
From:      phk@phk.freebsd.dk
To:        "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        des@ofug.org, nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org, peter@wemm.org, sos@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG, mdodd@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: The cbus driver for pc98 
Message-ID:  <63119.1045502530@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 17 Feb 2003 10:18:37 MST." <20030217.101837.40575213.imp@bsdimp.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20030217.101837.40575213.imp@bsdimp.com>, "M. Warner Losh" writes:
>In message: <xzpbs1bclbz.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
>            Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> writes:
>: Takahashi Yoshihiro <nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org> writes:
>: > I have had some questions like "Does PC98 have ISA bus?" or "Why PC98
>: > uses ISA driver?".  To clear these questions and problems, I think
>: > that adding separated cbus driver is better way.
>: 
>: So you're duplicating a large amount of existing, working code just so
>: you can avoid answering questions from confused users?  Or are there
>: any actual technical advantages to having a separate cbus driver?
>
>That's a little too harsh.

I actually think that it would be an improvement over the current
copy-the-isa-file-and-add-#ifdef-PC98-making-diffs-hard-to-read
approach.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?63119.1045502530>