Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 09:16:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Jamie Howard <howardjp@wam.umd.edu> To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: libcompat proposition Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9908130914100.26872-100000@dragon.ham.muohio.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9908121842050.26211-100000@dragon.ham.muohio.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Jamie Howard wrote: > How would those functions which also exist in libc (or possibly other > libraries, I don't know) be handled? Just following up to myself here, NetBSD has a getopt_long() in libc ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/NetBSD-current/src/lib/libc/stdlib/ I saw someone say that anything NetBSD did in the name of portability must be right (in the test thread). :) Jamie To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.10.9908130914100.26872-100000>