Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 09:30:15 +0200 From: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@voodoo.oberon.net> To: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/gettext Makefile Message-ID: <20040712073015.GL46056@voodoo.oberon.net> In-Reply-To: <20040712072558.GA38505@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200407120516.i6C5GThX001618@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040712054253.GB33305@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040712062800.GA37188@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040712063346.GA36974@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040712072558.GA38505@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--/qIPZgKzMPM+y5U5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 12:25:58AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > The interactive OPTIONS setting is easily disabled by setting BATCH >=20 > Interactive OPTIONS are heavy weight in the usability department -- the > Ports committers needs to take a serious look at what warrants OPTIONS > use. Otherwise the Ports Collection will become a tangled mess and less > and less usable. For one example, needing the root password twice just > to *BUILD* a port is unacceptable. OPTIONS are in pre-beta stage right now. I don't like it also, but AFAIK eik@ is working at replacement of it. =20 -Kirill --/qIPZgKzMPM+y5U5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA8j4HQC1G6a60JuURAsCAAKC6hmv5ijVf6dSOGQFywB6sIxz0xACg19XP 5K3oLSJmfBi7Lc3eelMICgM= =Ut3Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/qIPZgKzMPM+y5U5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040712073015.GL46056>