Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 17 Jun 2005 23:06:57 +0400
From:      Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru>
To:        Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ports/59695: [PATCH] devel/gmake: add two patches to avoid core dumps
Message-ID:  <42B31F51.4050506@ciam.ru>
In-Reply-To: <42B31A79.2070900@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <200506161937.j5GJb3sC023271@freefall.freebsd.org> <42B2A361.5000906@ciam.ru> <42B30931.4010901@FreeBSD.org> <42B3188F.70807@ciam.ru> <42B31A79.2070900@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ade Lovett wrote:
> No.  Sorry, but this is absolutely NOT going to happen.  The absolute
> last thing we need right now is to have two gmakes in the tree.  This
> will lead to serious confusion for absolutely minimal gain.

No confusion. If user installs -devel port, he understand he could meet 
problems.

> going nowhere.  I'm sorry, but the amount of pain likely to be caused by
> this does not justify the dubious benefits.  For instance, out of the
> 13,000 odd ports we have in the tree right now, I don't see gmake
> falling over on any of them with this particular issue.

Just because I can't add a port that affected the bugs.
The problem exist and it don't disappear if you say I see no problem.

--
Sem.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42B31F51.4050506>