Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 27 Oct 2003 11:58:29 +0100 (CET)
From:      Harti Brandt <brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
To:        Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc:        Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/chat Makefile
Message-ID:  <20031027115449.Y63585@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de>
In-Reply-To: <20031026171515.P17272@gamplex.bde.org>
References:  <200310260449.h9Q4nwm9016893@repoman.freebsd.org> <20031026171515.P17272@gamplex.bde.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:

BE>On Sat, 25 Oct 2003, Peter Wemm wrote:
BE>
BE>> peter       2003/10/25 21:49:58 PDT
BE>>
BE>>   FreeBSD src repository
BE>>
BE>>   Modified files:
BE>>     usr.bin/chat         Makefile
BE>>   Log:
BE>>   The math function logf() probably isn't doing us much good for logging
BE>>   stuff.  Add -fno-builtin-logf.
BE>
BE>gcc should be fixed instead of unportabilizing Makefiles like this.
BE>
BE>Don't forget to change this and all the misspellings of log and sin
BE>back when gcc is fixed :-).

:-( That won't happen. Gcc people think they're right to give this
warning. I'm awaiting the day when they add y0 and j0 as builtins...

Anyway these gcc-specific changes to the Makefiles are bad. As far as I
know there are people working on compiling with icc.

harti
-- 
harti brandt,
http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private
brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de, harti@freebsd.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031027115449.Y63585>