Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 07:02:45 -0500 From: "Jacques A . Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> To: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> Cc: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org>, thomas@hentschel.net, steve@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Zope port revamp [was ports/18444: zope port outdated] Message-ID: <20000614070245.D61826@bone.nectar.com> In-Reply-To: <20000614131325.B25770@pcwin002.win.tue.nl>; from stijn@win.tue.nl on Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 01:13:26PM %2B0200 References: <200005290250.TAA41586@freefall.freebsd.org> <200006132355.QAA19931@dorothy.hentschel.net> <20000614123022.A12825@mithrandr.moria.org> <20000614131325.B25770@pcwin002.win.tue.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 01:13:26PM +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote: > Well, check out http://www.zope.org/Products, and note that there are over 140 > 'products' available (there is a link at the bottom to the next twenty > products, I missed it the first time ;) A virtual category will suffice, I think. Just have a look at all the Perl modules in the ports system (and that represents just a fraction of the Perl modules that are available). Besides, we don't have any Zope Product ports just yet. > Maybe a common prefix would help in the meantime, like the perl modules? > Something like ports/www/zope-[squishdot,wiki,...]? I agree with this (zope- prefix for Zope Products). However, I think it is debatable that all Zope Products automatically belong in ports/www. e.g., I would argue that database connectors belong in ports/databases next to the likes of py-PyGreSQL, p5-Pg, and so on. -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000614070245.D61826>