Date: Wed, 26 Feb 97 03:08:11 +0100 From: Jean-Marc Zucconi <jmz@cabri.obs-besancon.fr> To: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu Cc: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/print/latex/scripts configure ports/print/latex Makefile Message-ID: <9702260208.AA27039@cabri.obs-besancon.fr> In-Reply-To: <199702250924.BAA05797@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> (asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> Satoshi Asami writes:
> * Modified: print/latex Makefile
> * Added: print/latex/scripts configure
> * Log:
> * Adapt to the new version of fetch.
> Perhaps related to the tex failure, but this one doesn't package
> either.
No this is my fault :-(. I should always install/test my ports in
empty directories....
> Satoshi
> P.S. It seems like print/{tex,latex} is giving us a very high problem
> rate, do we really need them now that teTeX is functional
> (usually) and contains a full *TeX distribution?
I don't know if many people use the tex/latex port. Of course, if
nobody use it, we can remove it. On the other hand there is a big
difference in size (because tetex has a lot of stuff).
Jean-Marc
_____________________________________________________________________________
Jean-Marc Zucconi Observatoire de Besancon F 25010 Besancon cedex
PGP Key: finger jmz@cabri.obs-besancon.fr
=============================================================================
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9702260208.AA27039>