Date: Sat, 08 Jun 1996 13:37:00 -0700 From: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freefall.freebsd.org>, current@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: As of 960608, routed now complains bitterly.. Message-ID: <199606082037.NAA06737@precipice.shockwave.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 08 Jun 1996 14:52:48 EDT." <9606081852.AA02677@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> Subject: As of 960608, routed now complains bitterly.. <<On Sat, 8 Jun 1996 01:18:16 -0700 (PDT), "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freefall. >>freebsd.org> said: > Messages of the form: > Jun 8 01:10:39 time routed[57]: rnh_addaddr() failed for 204.216.27.0 mask >>=0xfffffff0 > Jun 8 01:11:09 time routed[57]: rnh_addaddr() failed for 204.216.27.0 mask >>=0xfffffff0 > Spew where no messages spewed in former times. Just FYI.. This means that your netmasks are not configured correctly, either on the host, or a router to that network, or both. It happens when routed is listening to RIP packets labeled with one netmask on an interface which is locally configured for another. For example, for a while I had one router configured for 255.255.255.0 and one for 255.255.240.0 (both on the same subnet), and it complained bitterly until I fixed the configurations to agree. How are RIPv1 packets labeled with a netmask? You're not telling me that the new routed defaults to v2, are you? :-( grrr... Curious, Paul
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606082037.NAA06737>