Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 11:50:07 +0200 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.ORG> To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Fsck wrappers, revisited Message-ID: <20000922115007.A38174@roaming.cacheboy.net> In-Reply-To: <20001222191317.A7529@roaming.cacheboy.net>; from adrian@FreeBSD.ORG on Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 07:13:17PM %2B0100 References: <20001222191317.A7529@roaming.cacheboy.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > I've updated my fsck wrappers patchset to the latest netbsd and freebsd > fsck patches. I'd appreciate some feedback on them before I run off > and commit them (with my mentor, of course.) > > For those who aren't in the know, the general idea is that a single wrapper > program spawns a FS-specific fsck process a la mount and mount_*, making > multiple-FS support a lot easier. (Think about having fsck_ext2fs, fsck_msdos > and fsck_ffs doing your FSes on bootup..) > > They can be found at http://www.freebsd.org/~adrian/fsck/ . PLEASE read the > README before you use them, as there are a few gotchas. .. and I've just redone them again, with more bp comments. I've killed fsck_ffs/preen.c and moved the only function the fsck_ffs code now uses to a new util.c . This makes fsck_ffs a tiny bit smaller, and pretty much stomps on the shared code problem. Anyone else up for testing ? Adrian -- Adrian Chadd "The main reason Santa is so jolly is <adrian@freebsd.org> because he knows where all the bad girls live." -- Random IRC quote To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000922115007.A38174>