Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 17:33:58 -0700 From: "David Fisher" <fisherds74@hotmail.com> To: edwin@mavetju.org Cc: eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com Subject: Re: Issue with your exim port's Makefile Message-ID: <BAY18-F19qEBQdWfFMV00028fef@hotmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Well I see RFC 2821 : The "Received:" field contains a (possibly empty) list of name/value pairs followed by a semicolon and a date-time specification. The first item of the name/value pair is defined by item-name, and the second item is either an addr-spec, an atom, a domain, or a msg-id. Further restrictions may be applied to the syntax of the trace fields by standards that provide for their use, such as [RFC2821]. Which is specifying exactly what the semicolon is for! It must follow the date, that is why Outlook Express and Outlook are having this issue! -dave >From: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> >To: David Fisher <fisherds74@hotmail.com> >CC: eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com, ports@freebsd.org,markm@FreeBSD.org, >eik@FreeBSD.org >Subject: Re: Issue with your exim port's Makefile >Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 10:28:53 +1000 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from mailout2.barnet.com.au ([218.185.88.16]) by >mc8-f26.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Thu, 27 May 2004 >17:28:57 -0700 >Received: by mailout2.barnet.com.au (Postfix, from userid 27)id >01B06AA61D1; Fri, 28 May 2004 10:28:55 +1000 (EST) >Received: from mail2-auth.barnet.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1])(using TLSv1 >with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))(Client CN "*.barnet.com.au", >Issuer "BarNet Root Certificate Authority" (verified OK))by >mail2.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPid 97DBFB29E23; Fri, 28 May 2004 >10:28:55 +1000 (EST) >Received: from k7.mavetju (unknown [10.10.12.2])(using TLSv1 with cipher >DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))(Client CN "edwin.adsl.barnet.com.au", >Issuer "BarNet Root Certificate Authority" (verified OK))by >mail2-auth.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPid F1DAE193CE; Fri, 28 May >2004 10:28:54 +1000 (EST) >Received: by k7.mavetju (Postfix, from userid 1001)id 8E7D161CD; Fri, 28 >May 2004 10:28:53 +1000 (EST) >X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jEvUykwbC35ldm4+yYBT+w6 >X-Viruscan-Id: <40B687C700008B1DE59D8E@BarNet> >Message-ID: <20040528002853.GT2124@k7.mavetju> >References: <BAY18-F52cU6xfPTeip00053fb5@hotmail.com> >In-Reply-To: <BAY18-F52cU6xfPTeip00053fb5@hotmail.com> >User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i >Return-Path: edwin@mavetju.org >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 May 2004 00:28:58.0463 (UTC) >FILETIME=[C44966F0:01C4444A] > >On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 03:36:47PM -0700, David Fisher wrote: > > RFC 822 : > >RFC0822 is obsoleted, please see RFC2822, paragraph 3.2.3. > >Also, be tolerant with what you receive, be strict in what you send. > >Edwin > >-- >Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org >edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BAY18-F19qEBQdWfFMV00028fef>