Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:38:04 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> Cc: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PARTIAL SOLUTION] broken linuxulator in -current as of Jan 8 17:51:45 CET Message-ID: <20070110073804.1d2yx9s4080gow0o@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <23477685@srv.sem.ipt.ru> References: <57417212@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20070108180014.GA4540@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <20070108210813.368389dc@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20070109204604.62915dc7@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <89565167@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20070109213151.2bf5a8f3@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <46677978@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <80597611@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20070109210536.GA35880@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <55639944@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20070109215858.GA38499@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <23477685@srv.sem.ipt.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> (from Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:10:18 +0300): > On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:58:58 +0100 Divacky Roman wrote: > >> this is extremelly strange. I am struggling now with acroread >> (problems with pango) but overall it looks >> like almost working > >> I also tried current from August 1st (ie. before ANY of the 2.6 >> stuff got commited) and ls doesnt work. > >> does anyone see any explanation for this? > > Maybe since the FreeBSD librt was introduced (Mar 1 2006) nobody tried > linux ls without chroot? Or something between ls and librt was updated since then and causes this behavior. I don't think Roman reverted the linux base port while going back in time with the kernel. Bye, Alexander. -- If computers take over (which seems to be their natural tendency), it will serve us right. -- Alistair Cooke http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070110073804.1d2yx9s4080gow0o>