Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 09:12:32 +0200 From: Rene Ladan <r.c.ladan@gmail.com> To: Martin Wilke <miwi@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports UPDATING ports/Mk bsd.python.mk ports/biology/pymol Makefile pkg-plist ports/cad/pythoncad Makefile pkg-plist ports/databases/gadfly Makefile pkg-plist ports/databases/skytools Makefile pkg-plist ports/databases/zodb3 ... Message-ID: <e890cae60906090012x591e0fe1h6ea14a47f4d700c4@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200906082230.n58MUtkU040528@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200906082230.n58MUtkU040528@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2009/6/9 Martin Wilke <miwi@freebsd.org>: > miwi 2009-06-08 22:30:55 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > . UPDATING [...] > Log: > - Update lang/python26 and make Python 2.6.2 to the default Python version > > Tested by: 3 pointyhat runs > Thanks to: pav, gahr, lwhsu, mva, amdmi3 > I successfully upgraded python25 to python26 using portmaster -o, but got stuck at the upgrade-site-packages step. When executing # cd /usr/ports/lang/python # make PORTUPGRADE_CMD=/usr/local/sbin/portmaster upgrade-site-packages it complains that it can't find pkg_which, which seems to be part of portupgrade. Is pkg_which the same as pkg_info -wq or pkg_info -oq ? Is there a real difference between make upgrade-site-packages and just updating all installed *py25* packages manually? Regards, Rene -- http://www.rene-ladan.nl/ GPG fingerprint = E738 5471 D185 7013 0EE0 4FC8 3C1D 6F83 12E1 84F6 (subkeys.pgp.net)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e890cae60906090012x591e0fe1h6ea14a47f4d700c4>